UCSC NAV BAR

Department of Philosophy

Philosophy Home
People
Graduate Program
Undergraduate Program
Courses
Colloquia
Department News
Useful links

Support philosophy at UCSC!
Use the secure link below, and list "Philosophy Department" as the recipient.
Give to UCSC Online

Philosophy Department
UC Santa Cruz
1156 High Street
Santa Cruz, CA 95064
Phone (831) 459-2070

Fax (831) 459-2650


FALL 2006
PHILOSOPHY COURSE DESCRIPTIONS

Lower-Division Courses
22211/PHIL-9/Intro To Logic/Fruhling
MWF 08:00A-09:10A/Kresge Clrm 321

A study of correct reasoning, concentrating on developing the skills necessary to distinguish logically correct from logically incorrect arguments. The emphasis is on modern symbolic logic, although the traditional theory of the syllogism is also covered.


18928/PHIL-11/Intro To Philosophy/Otte
TTh 08:00A-09:45A/Humn Lecture 206

An introduction to the main areas of philosophy using both classic and contemporary sources. Focuses on central and enduring problems in philosophy such as skepticism about the external world, the mind-body problem, and the nature of morality.


22555/PHIL-80G/Bioethics 21st Cent/Metcalf, J and Akeson,M.A.
TTh 02:00P-03:45P/Earth&Marine B206

Serves science and non-science majors interested in bioethics. Guest speakers and instructors lead discussions of major ethical questions having arisen from research in genetics, medicine, and industries supported by this knowledge. (Also offered as Biomolecular Engineering 80G. Students cannot receive credit for both courses. Does not fulfill Philosophy major or minor requirements.)


History of Philosophy Courses


18935/PHIL-91/Ancient Greek Phil/Bowin,J.F.
MWF 09:30A-10:40A/Kresge Clrm 327

This course is a survey of ancient Greek philosophy of the Classical and Hellenistic periods. We will begin with Socrates and the pre-Socratics, then we will undertake an intensive study of Plato and Aristotle. After that we will survey the main developments that follow: Epicureanism, Stoicism, and Scepticism.

View the syllabus online.


22653/PHIL-108/19Th-C Philosophy/Hoy,J.B.
MWF 02:00P-03:10P/Soc Sci 1 110

Reading for this course will include selections from Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling, Schopenhauer’s World as Will and Representation, and various important works by Nietzsche in a newly-published Nietzsche Reader (2006 Blackwell Publishing). Approximately half the course will be devoted to Nietzsche. Participation in discussion sections will be mandatory. Written work will consist in take-home “exams” (short papers on assigned topics) on Hegel, Kierkegaard and Schopenhauer; an inclass exam on Nietzsche, and a longer (6-page) final paper on Nietzsche.


Upper-Division Courses


23615/PHIL-122/Metaphysics/Bowin,J.F.
TTh 10:00A-11:45A/Cowell Com 134

This course will be a survey of contemporary analytic metaphysics. Topics will include nominalism and metaphysical realism and the ontological analysis of concrete particulars, including problems of modality and persistence through time. The texts will be Michael Loux, Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction, Third Edition. (New York: Routledge, 2006). Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings, Michael Loux, ed. (New York: Routledge, 2001).

View the syllabus online.


24163/PHIL-142/Advanced Ethics/Guevara,D.E.
MW 07:00P-08:45P/Cowell Com 134


23616/PHIL-171/Faith And Reason/Otte,R.E.
TTh 10:00A-11:45A/PhysSciences 140

Recent work in analytic philosophy of religion, concentrating on traditional theism. Topics include arguments for and against the existence of God, religious experience, miracles, the relation of faith and reason, and problems such as freedom and divine foreknowledge.

Download the syllabus here (pdf).



PHIL-180H-01 Philosophy Colloquia (Staff) Class # 21510
A colloquia series that sponsors four speakers each quarter. Students required to attend all colloquia and class meetings and encouraged to form discussion groups after each lecture. Enrollment restricted to graduate students. May be repeated for credit.

For complete course information, visit the course web page at http://philosophy.ucsc.edu/colloquia_course.html
For colloquia location and times, visit http://philosophy.ucsc.edu/colloquia.html

DOES NOT FULFILL UPPER DIVISION MAJOR REQUIREMENT


Seminar Courses


/ PHIL-190P/Major Figures in Contemp Phil/Roth, P.A
W 3:30-6:30/Stevenson 217

This course will examine the thought of W.V. Quine (1908-2000). Quine's thought greatly shaped almost all key philosophical debates in the second half of the 20th century. Two core issues of his philosophy will be the focus of the readings. The first concerns his position on the notion of meaning--the thesis of the "indeterminacy of translation." Quine claims that there is "no fact of the matter" to what words or sentences mean. The second involves his conception of "epistemology naturalized." This involves a fundamental rethinking of what empiricism is, what epistemology is, and how to conceive of the relationship between philosophy and science. Readings will consist primarily of key essays by Quine on these two topics.Also offered as Phil 290P.


22465/PHIL-190Y/On Insults /Neu,J.
M 03:30P-06:30P/Cowell Acad 222

The schoolyard wisdom about "sticks and stones" does not take one very far: insults do not take the form only of words, even words have effects, and the popular as well as the standard legal distinctions between speech and conduct are at least as problematic as they are helpful. The questions to be addressed include: What kind of injury is an insult? Is its infliction determined by the insulter or the insulted? What does it reveal of the character of each and of the character of society and its conventions? What is its role in social and legal life (from play to jokes to ritual to war and from blasphemy to defamation to hate speech)? Philosophical, anthropological, psychoanalytic, and legal approaches to the questions are emphasized.Also offered as Phil 290Y.
Enrollment is by interview with the professor. Contact the department to schedule an interview.


/PHIL-190xx/Politics of Temporality/Hoy, D.
F 01:00P-04:00P/Humn 1 420

This course will explore the phenomenon that Husserl referred to as “Inner Time-Consciousness.” That designation of time as time-consciousness is problematic insofar as it construes time as “inner” rather than “outer,” as subjective rather than objective. Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger problematize the inner/outer distinction and generate a different account of temporality. Issues involve such questions as the following: How long does the present last? Is there a sense of the passing of time that is different from and prior to memory? What is the relation of experienced time to objective time? Furthermore, different philosophers prioritize the dimensions of time differently in ways that affect the political tone of their philosophies. Thus, the early Heidegger prioritizes the future, but differently than Walter Benjamin does. Hegel is said to prioritize the present, but differently than Husserl does. Gadamer prioritizes the past, but differently than Ranke does. Deleuze’s adaptation of Bergson will be a central issue, as will be Derrida’s and Zizek’s readings of late Heidegger. The advantages and disadvantages of each account of temporality will be discussed in seminar-style. Also offered as Phil 254.

Sample Schedule:
Week 1. Kant
Week II. Husserl & James
Week III. Husserl
Week IV. Heidegger on Kant
Week V. Heidegger & the Lost Present
Week VI. Hegel, Derrida
Week VII. Bergson, Deleuze
Week VIII. Walter Benjamin, Derrida
Week IX. Time Regained
Week X. Summary

Download the syllabus here (pdf).


Graduate Courses

23617/PHIL-201/First Quarter Seminar/Ellis,J.E./**To Be Arranged**


24000/PHIL-254/Politics of Temporality/Hoy, D./F/01:00P-04:00P/Humn 1 420

This course will explore the phenomenon that Husserl referred to as “Inner Time-Consciousness.” That designation of time as time-consciousness is problematic insofar as it construes time as “inner” rather than “outer,” as subjective rather than objective. Kant, Hegel, and Heidegger problematize the inner/outer distinction and generate a different account of temporality. Issues involve such questions as the following: How long does the present last? Is there a sense of the passing of time that is different from and prior to memory? What is the relation of experienced time to objective time? Furthermore, different philosophers prioritize the dimensions of time differently in ways that affect the political tone of their philosophies. Thus, the early Heidegger prioritizes the future, but differently than Walter Benjamin does. Hegel is said to prioritize the present, but differently than Husserl does. Gadamer prioritizes the past, but differently than Ranke does. Deleuze’s adaptation of Bergson will be a central issue, as will be Derrida’s and Zizek’s readings of late Heidegger. The advantages and disadvantages of each account of temporality will be discussed in seminar-style.

Sample Schedule:
Week 1. Kant
Week II. Husserl & James
Week III. Husserl
Week IV. Heidegger on Kant
Week V. Heidegger & the Lost Present
Week VI. Hegel, Derrida
Week VII. Bergson, Deleuze
Week VIII. Walter Benjamin, Derrida
Week IX. Time Regained
Week X. Summary


/PHIL-290P/Major Figures in Contemp Phil/Roth, P.A
W 3:30-6:30/Stevenson 217

This course will examine the thought of W.V. Quine (1908-2000). Quine's thought greatly shaped almost all key philosophical debates in the second half of the 20th century. Two core issues of his philosophy will be the focus of the readings. The first concerns his position on the notion of meaning--the thesis of the "indeterminacy of translation." Quine claims that there is "no fact of the matter" to what words or sentences mean. The second involves his conception of "epistemology naturalized." This involves a fundamental rethinking of what empiricism is, what epistemology is, and how to conceive of the relationship between philosophy and science. Readings will consist primarily of key essays by Quine on these two topics. Also offered as Phil 190P.


22465/PHIL-290Y/On Insults /Neu,J.
M 03:30P-06:30P/Cowell Acad 222

The schoolyard wisdom about "sticks and stones" does not take one very far: insults do not take the form only of words, even words have effects, and the popular as well as the standard legal distinctions between speech and conduct are at least as problematic as they are helpful. The questions to be addressed include: What kind of injury is an insult? Is its infliction determined by the insulter or the insulted? What does it reveal of the character of each and of the character of society and its conventions? What is its role in social and legal life (from play to jokes to ritual to war and from blasphemy to defamation to hate speech)? Philosophical, anthropological, psychoanalytic, and legal approaches to the questions are emphasized. Also offered as Phil 190Y.
Enrollment is by interview with the professor. Contact the department to schedule an interview.

6/12/07 ljm